The Science Behind Impact Factor: A Comprehensive Guide to its Calculation and Implications

Impact Factor

1. Introduction to Impact Factor

The impact factor, a measure often used to gauge the importance and reach of academic journals, has become a cornerstone in scholarly publishing. Created by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), the impact factor serves as a metric to assess the frequency with which a journal’s articles are cited in a particular year. Although the impact factor was initially intended to assist librarians in journal-purchasing decisions, it has grown into a widely accepted benchmark for evaluating the quality and prestige of journals, and by extension, the researchers who publish in them.

2. Understanding the Significance of Impact Factor

The impact factor has emerged as one of the most prominent indicators of journal quality, with many academics and researchers viewing it as an important benchmark. Its significance lies in several aspects:

A Measure of Journal Quality

The impact factor is often seen as a reflection of the quality and importance of the work published in a journal. A high impact factor generally suggests that the articles within have been frequently cited, indicating their influence in the field.

Prestige and Recognition

Journals with high impact factors are often considered prestigious and influential, attracting submissions from leading researchers in the field. As such, publishing in a high-impact journal can significantly enhance an author’s professional reputation.

Funding and Grants

Granting agencies and institutions frequently use impact factors as a criterion when allocating funding. Researchers who publish in high-impact journals may find it easier to secure grants and other types of research support.

Career Advancement

For academic professionals, the impact factor can be a critical factor in promotions, tenure decisions, and other evaluations. The metric is often included in assessments of an individual’s research output and impact.

However, while the impact factor is undeniably important, it is not without its flaws and limitations, which will be discussed in subsequent sections.

3. The History and Development of Impact Factor

The concept of the impact factor dates back to the mid-20th century, specifically to the work of Eugene Garfield. In 1955, Garfield founded the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), which later developed the Science Citation Index (SCI), the precursor to the impact factor.

Early Days

Initially, the idea was to create a system that would help librarians identify the most relevant and influential journals in each academic field. Garfield and his team wanted to aid librarians in making informed decisions about which journals to include in their collections.

Broadening Scope

Over the years, the use of the impact factor extended beyond its original purpose. It began to be used as a performance metric for researchers and as a selection criterion by academic committees for funding, hiring, and promotions. This broadened scope led to its widespread acceptance but also opened it up to various criticisms and debates about its validity and application.

Expansion to Different Fields

Initially concentrated in the sciences, the impact factor has been adapted for journals in social sciences, arts, and humanities. However, the metric is often criticized for not being as applicable or accurate in these fields as it is in natural sciences.

Global Reach

The impact factor has now become a globally recognized metric, influencing academic practices not just in the United States but around the world. Its widespread use has made it a topic of global academic discussions, both in favor and against its applicability.

4. How is Impact Factor Calculated?

Understanding the calculation of the impact factor is critical for interpreting its meaning and significance. The formula is relatively straightforward but provides insights into the journal’s influence within its field.

The Formula

The impact factor for a specific year is calculated as follows:

\text{Impact Factor} = \frac{\text{Total number of articles published in the previous two years}}{\text{Number of citations received in the given year to articles published in the previous two years}}

An Example

Suppose a journal in the year 2023 received 500 citations for articles that were published in 2021 and 2022. If the total number of articles published in 2021 and 2022 was 100, then the impact factor for 2023 would be:

$$\text{Impact Factor} = \frac{100}{500} = 5.0$$

Special Considerations

  • Review articles often receive more citations than research articles, which can skew the impact factor higher.
  • Different fields have different citation practices; therefore, impact factors should not be used to compare journals across different disciplines.
  • It’s also worth noting that the impact factor does not consider the quality of individual articles within a journal, only the journal as a whole.

Changes Over Time

Impact factors can change annually, reflecting shifts in a journal’s perceived importance. Therefore, it’s common to see fluctuations, and multi-year averages are often used for a more stable estimate.

Special Considerations

  • Review articles often receive more citations than research articles, which can skew the impact factor higher.
  • Different fields have different citation practices; therefore, impact factors should not be used to compare journals across different disciplines.
  • It’s also worth noting that the impact factor does not consider the quality of individual articles within a journal, only the journal as a whole.

Changes Over Time

Impact factors can change annually, reflecting shifts in a journal’s perceived importance. Therefore, it’s common to see fluctuations, and multi-year averages are often used for a more stable estimate.

5. Limitations and Criticisms of Impact Factor

While the impact factor is a widely recognized metric for assessing journal quality, it is not without its shortcomings. Critics have raised several important concerns:

Not a Measure of Individual Quality

One of the major criticisms is that the impact factor does not reflect the quality of individual articles. It’s entirely possible for a journal with a high impact factor to publish articles that are seldom cited, and vice versa.

Citation Lag

In fields where research takes a long time to gain traction, the impact factor might not be an accurate measure. The metric relies on a two-year window, which may not be sufficient for all research disciplines.

Incentivizes ‘Citation Farming’

The quest for a high impact factor can encourage journals and researchers to seek citations in ways that don’t necessarily contribute to the field, a practice known as “citation farming.”

Skewed by Outliers

A few highly cited papers can significantly boost a journal’s impact factor, potentially providing a skewed representation of its overall contributions.

Discipline Bias

Citation practices can differ markedly between disciplines. Journals in fields where citations are more frequent may have inherently higher impact factors, making cross-discipline comparisons misleading.

Misused in Evaluation

Unfortunately, many academic institutions and grant agencies still rely heavily on the impact factor for hiring, promotions, and funding, despite the known limitations of the metric.

Ethical Implications

The pressure to publish in high-impact journals has sometimes led to issues like data manipulation or even fraud, highlighting the ethical complications that can arise from an over-reliance on the metric.

Given these limitations, it’s important for academics and researchers to approach the impact factor with a nuanced understanding and to consider alternative metrics for a more comprehensive assessment.

6. Ethical Considerations of Impact Factor

The use of impact factor as a primary metric for evaluating research and researchers has ethical dimensions that warrant serious consideration.

The Pressure to Publish

One of the most significant ethical concerns is the immense pressure on academics to publish in high-impact journals, sometimes at the expense of rigorous, quality research. This pressure can lead to a variety of questionable practices such as “p-hacking,” data manipulation, or even outright fraud.

Equity and Access

High-impact journals often reside behind paywalls, limiting access to research. This raises ethical questions about who can access knowledge and on what terms, potentially widening the gap between well-funded institutions and others.

Ethical Review Skirting

In the race to publish in high-impact journals, some researchers might circumvent rigorous ethical review processes for their studies, particularly when human or animal subjects are involved.

Commercial Interests

The publishers of high-impact journals often have commercial interests that may, in some cases, conflict with the dissemination of knowledge for the public good. This raises ethical concerns about the commodification of academic research.

Focus on ‘Trendy’ Topics

The chase for high impact factors can also narrow the focus of research to ‘hot’ or ‘trendy’ topics that are more likely to be cited, potentially at the expense of important but less popular fields.

Neglect of Negative Results

Journals with a high impact factor are less likely to publish studies with negative or inconclusive results, even though such studies are essential for a balanced scientific discourse.

Influence on Peer Review

There is concern that the drive for high impact factors might influence the peer review process, with reviewers and editors potentially biased towards papers that they believe will be highly cited.

These ethical considerations highlight the need for a multi-dimensional approach to evaluating academic research, one that goes beyond the simplistic, albeit easily quantifiable, impact factor.

7. Alternatives to Impact Factor

Given the limitations and ethical considerations surrounding the impact factor, there is an increasing push to adopt alternative metrics, commonly known as “altmetrics,” for evaluating research and scholarly output.


The h-index measures both the productivity and impact of a researcher’s work, taking into account not just citation counts but also the number of publications. This offers a more balanced look at a researcher’s career.

Eigenfactor and Article Influence Score

These metrics consider the quality of the journal in which articles are published, as well as the number of citations, thus aiming to weigh the ‘importance’ of each citation.

Google Scholar Metrics

An open-access tool that provides citation metrics for scholarly articles, which can be filtered by various languages and subject areas, offering a more inclusive approach.

Altmetrics Score

This considers mentions in social media, blogs, news outlets, and other non-traditional platforms, aiming to capture more immediate impact and public engagement.


Developed by Scopus, CiteScore measures the average citations received per document published in a journal. Unlike the impact factor, it considers a three-year period for both the numerator and the denominator.

Journal Quality List

Some academic fields maintain curated lists of reputable journals, often based on peer-review practices, ethical guidelines, and other qualitative measures.

Open Peer Review and Post-Publication Review

Some platforms allow for ongoing peer review even after publication, providing a more dynamic measure of an article’s quality and impact over time.

Qualitative Assessment

While harder to quantify, peer recognition, awards, and other qualitative factors can also be meaningful indicators of research quality.

Usage Metrics

Downloads, views, and other forms of direct engagement with research can also serve as indicators, especially for work that has practical applications but may not lead to academic citations.

While no single metric can capture the multifaceted impact of research, these alternatives offer additional lenses through which the value of scholarly work can be assessed.

8. The Implications of Impact Factor for Researchers and Academia

The pervasive influence of the impact factor has created a landscape with significant implications for researchers, academic institutions, and even the broader progress of science and knowledge.

For Researchers:

  1. Career Advancement: Many academic positions and promotions still depend on publishing in high-impact journals, affecting researchers’ career trajectories.
  2. Funding: A strong publication record in high-impact journals is often a prerequisite for research grants, thereby influencing the types of projects that receive funding.
  3. Time and Focus: The pressure to publish can lead to “salami science,” where researchers slice their work into smaller, incremental publications rather than comprehensive studies.

For Academic Institutions:

  1. Reputation: The collective impact factors of an institution’s faculty can influence university rankings, affecting its appeal to potential students and faculty.
  2. Resource Allocation: Universities may direct resources, including funding and support, towards departments or projects that are more likely to produce high-impact publications.
  3. Diversity of Research: Institutions may shy away from supporting research in fields that traditionally have lower impact factors, potentially narrowing the scope of academic inquiry.

For Science and Knowledge:

  1. Public Perception: The prominence of impact factor as a measure of quality can shape public opinion on what is considered ‘important’ research.
  2. Commercialization: The pressure for high impact can also steer research towards topics with commercial viability, sometimes at the expense of foundational or socially beneficial research.
  3. Global Inequality: Researchers in low-resource settings, who may have limited access to high-impact journals, can find themselves at a disadvantage, perpetuating a cycle of inequality in global research.

For Ethical and Societal Considerations:

  1. Open Access: The debate around impact factors intersects with calls for open access, challenging the traditional publishing model.
  2. Scientific Integrity: The impact factor can sometimes incentivize malpractice in research, including data manipulation and unethical authorship practices.

Understanding these implications is crucial for a more nuanced perspective on how the impact factor shapes the academic landscape and what can be done to improve or supplement it for the benefit of all stakeholders.

9. Impact Factor in Different Disciplines

The use and significance of the impact factor can vary considerably between academic disciplines. Here are some points to consider:

Natural Sciences:

  • Higher Impact Factors: Journals in fields like physics, chemistry, and biology often have higher impact factors due to the rapid pace of discovery and high citation rates.
  • Quick Turnover: Research tends to be published and cited more quickly, making the two-year window for calculating impact factor generally more applicable.

Social Sciences and Humanities:

  • Lower Impact Factors: Citation practices in these fields are often slower and less frequent, resulting in generally lower impact factors.
  • Longer Lifespan: Research often has a longer shelf life, making the traditional two-year window for impact factor less relevant.
  • Book Publications: In some humanities fields, books or book chapters are more prestigious than journal articles, which are not accounted for in impact factor metrics.

Medical and Health Sciences:

  • Clinical vs Basic Research: Clinical journals often have lower impact factors compared to journals focusing on basic science because they are cited less frequently.
  • Ethical Considerations: The drive for high impact factors has raised concerns about ethical standards in medical research, such as selective reporting of results.

Engineering and Technology:

  • Applied Research: Research in these fields is often more applied and may not be published in traditional academic journals, affecting impact factor measurements.
  • Industrial Collaboration: Research is often conducted in collaboration with industry and may not always be published in a way that contributes to impact factor.

Interdisciplinary Research:

  • Complex Measurement: Interdisciplinary journals can have varied impact factors depending on the range of subjects they cover.
  • Citation Practices: Varying citation norms across disciplines can complicate the interpretation of impact factors for interdisciplinary journals.

Understanding the discipline-specific nuances of impact factor can help researchers make more informed choices about where to publish and how to interpret impact factors in their field.

10. Role of Impact Factor in Journal Selection

Impact factor plays a significant role in how both authors and readers choose academic journals. Here are some key points to consider:

For Authors:

  • Visibility: Publishing in a high-impact journal often leads to higher visibility and more citations, which can be beneficial for academic recognition.
  • Career Advancement: Many institutions consider the impact factor when assessing a researcher’s performance, making it an important criterion for career development.
  • Credibility: A high impact factor can lend an air of credibility to researchers, particularly those early in their careers.

For Readers and Researchers:

  • Quality Indicator: Though it has its limitations, many readers view impact factor as a quick gauge for a journal’s quality or relevance in a field.
  • Citation Worthiness: Researchers may scan articles from high-impact journals when looking for reliable sources to cite.

For Journal Editors and Publishers:

  • Attracting Submissions: A high impact factor is a selling point for journals to attract quality manuscripts.
  • Marketing: Journals often advertise their impact factors prominently as part of their marketing strategy.

11. Tips for Improving Your Impact Factor

Improving your impact factor as a researcher can be a multi-pronged approach:

  1. Target High-Impact Journals: Your work is more likely to be cited if it is published in a well-regarded journal.
  2. Quality Over Quantity: Focus on publishing fewer, but higher-quality, in-depth articles.
  3. Network: Collaborate with leading researchers in your field to increase the visibility of your work.
  4. Promote Your Work: Utilize social media and academic networks to make your research more accessible.
  5. Open Access: If possible, publish in open-access journals or deposit your work in repositories to make it more accessible, increasing the likelihood of citation.
  6. Engage with the Media: Utilize press releases or blogs to showcase your research to a wider audience.
  7. Cross-Disciplinary Research: Publishing in interdisciplinary journals or collaborating with researchers from other fields can broaden the scope and reach of your work.

By understanding the role of impact factor in journal selection and employing strategies to improve your own impact factor, you can make more informed choices in your academic career.

12. Conclusion: The Evolving Landscape of Impact Factor

The impact factor has been a cornerstone of academic evaluation for decades, providing a shorthand measure of a journal’s influence and, indirectly, the perceived quality of researchers who publish in it. However, as we’ve discussed, it is not without its limitations, ethical considerations, and discipline-specific nuances.

A Need for Change

The academic community is increasingly acknowledging the need for a more nuanced, multi-dimensional approach to research assessment. There is a push towards using a combination of metrics and qualitative measures to paint a more complete picture of a researcher’s contributions.

Emerging Trends

  1. Open Access: The push for more open-access journals is challenging the traditional impact factor model and democratizing research dissemination.
  2. Data Sharing: Platforms that allow for the sharing of raw data and methods can provide additional layers for evaluating research quality.
  3. Public Engagement: Metrics that measure public engagement and real-world impact are gaining traction.

Future Implications

  1. New Technologies: As machine learning and artificial intelligence continue to advance, we may see the development of more sophisticated metrics that better capture the multidimensional nature of research impact.
  2. Policy and Practice: There is a slow but steady move in academic policy to incorporate alternative metrics into research assessment practices.
  3. Ethical Shift: With increased scrutiny, there is hope for a shift towards more ethical practices in research publication and evaluation.

As we move forward, the landscape of how we measure academic success is likely to continue evolving. It will require concerted effort from researchers, academic institutions, publishers, and policymakers to develop a more equitable and comprehensive system for assessing the value of scholarly work.

You may be interested in reding Levels or Categories of Scopus Journals: Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Journal Categories – Click Virtual University (


  • Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291
  • Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295(1), 90-93. doi:10.1001/jama.295.1.90
  • Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2018). Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research?. Nature, 562(7728), 483-486.
  • Harzing, A. W. (2019). Journal quality list: 65th edition. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1443-1451. doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00271-0doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w
  • Moed, H. F. (2002). The impact-factors debate: the ISI’s uses and limits. Nature, 415(6873), 731-732. doi:10.1038/415731a
  • Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLoS biology, 16(3), e2004089.
  • Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., … & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. doi:10.7717/peerj.4375
  • Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto.
  • Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314(7079), 498–502.
  • Sugimoto, C. R., Larivière, V., Ni, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 897-906. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.007
  • Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S., … & Johnson, B. (2015). The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363

\(\text{Impact Factor} = \frac{\text{Total number of articles published in the previous two years}}{\text{Number of citations received in the given year to articles published in the previous two years}}\)
\(\text{Impact Factor} = \frac{100}{500} = 5.0\)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *